"Støtt Dr Myhill" - en lege som bryr seg (England)

[Vigdis]

Fra save natural Thyroid på Facebook:

"Dr Myhill: The Panel has considered all the information presented. It has taken account of the submissions made on behalf of the GMC and those made on your behalf. On behalf of the GMC, Mr Summers referred to two complaints. The first complaint was made by a group of general ... See morepractitioners regarding your suggested management of a patient with a neurological disease. The second complaint related to the content of your website. Mr Summers submitted that an order for interim conditions was necessary in all the circumstances.

Mr Macdonald, on your behalf, submitted that no order was necessary and that the concerns raised were unfounded, particularly in light of the large number of testimonials, supportive of your practice. It has noted your evidence to the Panel that you deny the allegations, and has taken into account your concerns raised regarding the accuracy of the GMC's case.

The circumstances surrounding this case relate to concerns regarding your clinical and professional practice, and concerns regarding your website, your promotion of treatments and consequently your potential failure to recognise and work within the limits of your competence. At all times, a doctor is responsible for ensuring their own good medical practice, and it is their responsibility to practise safely and in accordance with the requisite guidance.

The Panel has determined that in accordance with Section 41A of the Medical Act 1983, as amended, it is necessary for the protection of members of the public and in the public interest to make an order imposing the following interim conditions on your registration for a period of 18 months, with effect from today.

1. You must not prescribe any prescription only medication, as detailed in the British National Formulary;

2. Within 14 days of today's hearing you must ensure that in relation to your website, or any website relating to your medical practice or business, all pages, downloadable content, including documents, forum or discussion board content, or other references or online media relating to the following subjects must be removed:

a. The medical management of cases relating to cardiology, or cardiovascular disease including; chest pain due to ischaemic heart disease; acute coronary syndrome; heart failure; or pulmonary embolus;
b. The treatment of asthma;
c. The treatment, testing, identification, diagnosis or management of breast cancer;
d. The use of hormonal contraceptive medication;
e. The pharmacological management of primary or secondary prevention of vascular disease;
f. Any immunisation or vaccination;

3. You must obtain the approval of the GMC before accepting any post for which registration with the GMC is required;

4. You must inform the GMC if you apply for medical employment outside the UK;

5. You must inform the following parties that your registration is subject to the conditions, listed at 1 to 4 above:

a. Any organisation or person employing or contracting with you to undertake medical work; and
b. Any prospective employer or contracting body (at the time of application).

In reaching its decision the Panel first considered whether it was necessary for the protection of members of the public, in the public interest, or in your own interests to impose any interim order. It is not the Panel's purpose to test the veracity of any information put before it. It has reminded itself of the test it must apply and of its nature, function and powers, as well as its duty to consider each case on its individual merits. The Panel's function is not one of fact finding and the Panel must impose the order it determines necessary notwithstanding any potential for loss or hardship.

In considering the protection of members of the public and the public interest,
the Panel is concerned by the allegations made and is satisfied that, if substantiated, your actions could indicate a potentially serious limitation on your insight into your fitness to practise and the consequences of your actions, particularly for vulnerable people who may be accessing your website. As a consequence if the allegations are proven your behaviour could have an adverse effect on the confidence and trust that the members of the public are entitled to place in the profession and its practitioners.

The Panel was concerned that some of the information contained within your website may indicate that you are practising outwith your area of expertise and therefore are potentially putting patients at risk by providing misleading or inaccurate information. The Panel was also troubled that on the basis of your statement and evidence today, you may lack insight into the issues raised by the GMC. In considering the GMC's document Good Medical Practice the Panel has borne in mind that it is a fundamental Duty of a Doctor to recognise and work within the limits of your competence. Furthermore, the Panel notes that, as a doctor, if you publish information about your medical services you must make sure the information is factual and verifiable.

Accordingly, the Panel is satisfied that there is sufficient information before it to indicate that there may be impairment of your fitness to practise and that such impairment may pose a real risk to members of the public, and may adversely affect the public interest. You are a registered medical practitioner and are expected to behave in a manner that justifies the public trust in the profession and its practitioners at all times.

Having determined that an interim order is necessary, the Panel then went on to consider if an interim order for conditions would be workable, practicable, sufficient and appropriate. In all the circumstances, the Panel is satisfied that a restriction, by way of interim conditions, is appropriate and sufficient, to guard against the risk that your actions potentially have for patients, the public, and the public interest. The public interest includes not only upholding and declaring the appropriate standards of professional behaviour, but also maintaining trust in the profession. Trust is crucial to the doctor/patient relationship.

The Panel is required to consider for what duration an interim order is necessary. The Panel notes that there are a number of issues to investigate and that the GMC's final consideration of your case may take some time. Therefore, it is necessary to impose the above conditions on your registration for a period of 18 months. In doing so the Panel notes that the order will be reviewed within six months, or earlier should circumstances surrounding your case change.

The Panel has taken account of the issue of proportionality in that it must act in a way which is fair and reasonable. Whilst it notes that its order restricts your ability to practise medicine, the Panel has determined that, given the nature of this case, imposing conditions on your registration, at this time, is a necessary and proportionate response to the risks posed by you practicing medicine unrestricted.

Notification of this decision will be served upon you in accordance with the Medical Act 1983, as amended."

Les mer om Sarah Myhill på nettsiden hennes

http://www.drmyhill.co.uk/

Hva galt har hun gjort? Verden er ikke alltid helt rett skrudd sammen

[Hansen]

Tja, - - galt og galt.
Det er alltid minst to måter å se en sak på. Domstoler utøver det myndighetene har bestemt - og det er jo i praksis legenes egeninteresse.

Hun får ikke lov å skrive ut medisin i 18mnd (forsto jeg ?) fordi hun har behandlet pasienter på en måte som strider mot de økonomiske avtaler legene har fått tillatelse til av valgte myndigheter til å drive etter.

Man ser helt bort fra lovord om behandlingen fra hennes pasienter........
Og det samme gjør de jo her på berget.....
Jeg har jo hatt en sak oppe i trygderetten og der tok man NULL hensyn til at jeg var blitt mye bedre med tyroid behandling.

[nora]

Det er igjen noen leger (ikke pasienter) som har klaget Dr. Myhill inn for GMC.
Akkurat som hos Dr. Skinner og Peatfield.

http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?ui...99603&topic=77 egen gruppe der
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/w...d_/8650048.stm

Hun mistet retten til å foreskrive medisiner

Det kan tenkes at det er derfor Balderklinikken ligger noe lavt i terrenget ang. behandling med Thyroid, at de helst ikke behandler til TSH 0,00 for i ikke terge på seg noen leger.

Men vi har ikke noen tilsvarende instans her i Norge, heldigvis. At noen leger klager inn andre leger for at de har vært flinkere enn dem slik at deres omdømme har blitt dårlig.

[Nielsigne]

Dr. Sarah Myhill, engelsk læge, der har hjulpet sine patienter med blandt andet thyroid og indsprøjtninger med b12-vitamin, og som nu af konventionelle læger er kørt i stilling som heks, kommer i tv på torsdag den 20. maj.

Det drejer sig om et to timer langt chat-show, live. Seere kan sende spørgsmål ind, og Myhill vil svare dem live.

Sky Channel 200 kl. 20.

Jeg kan ikke huske at have læst om Myhill her på forum, men læs evt. om hende her:
http://www.drmyhill.co.uk/

og her:

http://www.stopthethyroidmadness.com...ill-of-the-uk/

[Anisa]

[smgj]

Jeg synes denne var fin - og oppløftende. Tenk om vi hadde blitt møtt med denne under og etter diagnostisering hos vår almennlege... Les den gjerne - det er en gjennomtenkt artikkel om lavt stoffskifte, blodprøver og behandling - med mange gullkorn.
http://www.supportdrmyhill.co.uk/_thryoid.html

Om referansene brukt for å avgjøre "om en person er frisk":

All our clinical experince of patients presenting with the many symptoms and signs of hypothyroidism who improve with treatment, leads us to suspect that hypothyroidism is much more common than generally stated. Reference ranges are misunderstood because people who could benefit from thyroid hormones are classed as normals even though they are at the limits or within 10% of the limits of the reference ranges.

The present serum biochemistry testing fails to indicate the rate of natural production and consumption of the hormones and has limited use as markers of status. The clinical picture is most important. We do need more sensitive biochemical indicators and some clinicans use urinary excretion indices as markers of sufficient hormone production. This needs further esearch.

Den sier også en del om prinsippene for en oppmedisinering:

The starting dose of thyroid hormones depends on the size and the state of unwellness of the patient. Small unwell patients should be started on just 12.5mcg daily, then increase their dose in 12.5mcg increments every two weeks until they get to 50mcg daily, at which point recheck the biochemistry. If the patient has a low T3 then some will find some benefit from a very small dose of T3 in the morning or twice daily as well as T4 replacement . Presently T3 is provided as a tiny 20 mcgm tablet and a quarter with food twice daily can dramatically improve well being. Later the T3 may not be needed and as it has a short half life, stopping this after the T4 has
stabilised will quickly enable a check to be made to ensure that T4 to T3 conversion continues normally on just T4 therapy.

Large and more robust individuals could be started on 50mcg daily and increase in 25mcg every two weeks until they get to 100mcg daily, wait four weeks for blood levels to stabilise and then recheck the biochemistry.

Så kan man jo også lese endokrinologenes statement... og sette seg og gråte.
http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/specialti...0Statement.pdf

Og så kan man lese om hva denne legen (som skrev det første) har blitt utsatt for av sine kolleger http://www.supportdrmyhill.co.uk/latest_news.html

Jeg vet iallfall at jeg mye heller ville ha blitt behandlet av den legen som skrev det første dokumentet, enn noen av de legene som stilte seg bak pdf-dokumentet.

[Anisa]

God opfølgning, Smgj

Det er igjen noen leger (ikke pasienter) som har klaget Dr. Myhill inn for GMC.
Akkurat som hos Dr. Skinner og Peatfield.

Om dr. Skinner: Nytt fra england, idag er Dr. Skinners fitness to practice (tråden er fra 2007)

Dr. Peatfield har Anitab været hos: Vært hos Dr. Peatfield. Jeg skal bli bra! (tråden er fra 2008)

[Kevlin]

Så kan man jo også lese endokrinologenes statement... og sette seg og gråte.
http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/specialti...0Statement.pdf

"Setting higher medical standards" - NEPPE!!!!
Og som hovedbidragsyter til disse "bekymrede parter" glimrer Legemiddelindustrien med sitt fravær
for det er jo selvfølgelig de som i hovedsak står bak denne Galskapen.

Thyroid er nevnt som noe som IKKE skal gis; for det kan være skadelig!!!!!
FOR et MAKKVERK; stakkars engelskmenn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tillegg: masse å lese på Myhills hjemmeside - en link som burde ligge på forsiden av Forumet

Les mer om Sarah Myhill på nettsiden hennes

http://www.drmyhill.co.uk/

Hva galt har hun gjort? Verden er ikke alltid helt rett skrudd sammen

TILTREDES

[smgj]

JUHUUU!!!!!

http://www.drmyhill.co.uk/wiki/News
http://www.supportdrmyhill.co.uk/

[Nielsigne]

Så flot!



... men håber, Myhill igen får lov at give indsprøjtninger med B-12 og magnesium .... eller i hvert fald B-12. Kender ikke til det med indsprøjtninger er magnesium Hvad i alverden skulle problemet være ved at få B-12 på den måde ?!