Sitat Opprinnelig skrevet av Admin Vis post



Best wishes to you too.

It's a very fine answer, but it seems like you can not see, that eAware's notice is not addressed to you about your book, but more is it about those perceptions (misconceptions?) some people on the Web interpret from your book.

Maybe you should consider if / when you publish the next edition of the book to include some sort of disclaimer, or some other form of attempt to prevent misinterpretation of the information your book offers. You can of course say that one can never avoid that some people misinterpret the book's messages, and you'r right, but rather do something than not doing anything. For the sake of those who just are most troubled and most vulnerable, and who sees your book as their last chance.

You're the writer. You have a mission and you have an obligation to take care of it. That your book is not used as alleged source of spreading misinformation by third persons. As I said - you're the writer and therefore you are the only one who can do it.

Our agenda is to try to protect those who may not have the benefit of the method. Those who have the benefit of the method, they do not need our attention and they are doing just fine in any case ..
If you had actually read my book you would have noticed the massive disclaimer at the beginning.

But thanks for pointing out the sense in it. If someone who has an alternative agenda wants to attempt to misinterpret something then they can easily do so. I am sure many that read things like the e-aware post or even your own will realise this. My book is accurate and honest and the methods described within it are explained with all the necessary caveats. I suggest you actually read it rather than reading other peoples misinformation about it.

Best wishes,
Paul